Updated on September 21, 2022
HealthDay operates under the strictest editorial standards. Our syndicated news content is completely independent of any financial interests, is based solely on industry-respected sources and the latest scientific research, and is carefully fact-checked by a team of industry experts to ensure accuracy.
- All articles are edited and checked for factual accuracy by our Editorial Team prior to being published.
- Unless otherwise noted, all articles focusing on new research are based on studies published in peer-reviewed journals or issued from independent and respected medical associations, academic groups and governmental organizations.
- Each article includes a link or reference to the original source.
- Any known potential conflicts of interest associated with a study or source are made clear to the reader.
Please see our Editorial and Fact-Checking Policy for more detail.Editorial and Fact-Checking Policy
HealthDay Editorial Commitment
HeathDay is committed to maintaining the highest possible levels of impartial editorial standards in the content that we present on our website. All of our articles are chosen independent of any financial interests. Editors and writers make all efforts to clarify any financial ties behind the studies on which we report.
MONDAY, July 11, 2022 (HealthDay News) -- Early in the pandemic, scores of Americans bought pulse oximeters to help determine how sick they were while infected with COVID-19, but new research finds the devices often miss dangerously low blood oxygen levels in Black veterans.
This is not the first time such inaccuracies have been spotted in Black patients: The problem is serious enough to have prompted the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to announce it will hold a public meeting of its Medical Devices Advisory Committee to discuss the accumulating evidence and make recommendations for the use of pulse oximeters. No date has been set for the meeting yet.
The latest research, which culled data from over 100 VA hospitals throughout the United States, follows up on the team's original study in 2020.
In the new study, the oximeters were recorded as being off by at least 4 percentage points from arterial blood gas readings, on average. Blood gas readings, where blood is drawn from an artery to measure blood oxygen levels, was used by the University of Michigan researchers to compare against oxygen levels read by the pulse oximeters.
The study authors likened the inaccuracies to grades in school: if you're scoring high A's, a couple of points don't matter much — a 96 and a 100 are still an A grade. But there's a big difference between an 88 and a 92, a B+ and an A-, respectively. With blood oxygen levels, any reading below 92 is considered dangerous.
"This is about your brain not getting enough oxygen," said senior study author Dr. Theodore Iwashyna, a professor of internal medicine at the University of Michigan.
Still, some experts argue that the data might be biased because of the nature of its control group.
"In some ways, I would say the blood gas [reading] is not an appropriate control," said Dr. Arjun Venkatesh, chief of the section of administration of emergency medicine at Yale University School of Medicine, in New Haven, Conn. Venkatesh noted that the ideal setting for this test would be in a clinic or hospital using people with normal breathing rather than those in critical care.
"Otherwise, we're looking at a very select group of people who happened to get an arterial blood gas when there's some sudden rapid change happening or when you're already on a ventilator,” he explained.
Venkatesh also suggested that this kind of data isn't always clean.
"We did a study early in the COVID pandemic on those thermometers that are used on peoples' heads," Venkatesh explained. "We did the same thing, we took a lot of electronic health records data, but we found that the data lined up terribly."
But the University of Michigan researchers said they've faced similar criticism with each study they have published, which is why their latest effort turned to the VA health system, honing in on more than 30,000 veterans who received both a pulse oximeter reading and an arterial blood gas test within 10 minutes of each other.
Their new findings were published online July 6 in the BMJ.
Bad blood oxygen readings can also hamper care, research shows.
In another study, published online July 11 in JAMA Internal Medicine, investigators at Brigham and Women's Hospital and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston found pulse oximeter inaccuracies may also be associated with disparities in care. The researchers found that Black, Hispanic and Asian patients treated in the ICU not only had greater discrepancies between pulse oximeter readings and blood gas tests, but they also received less supplemental oxygen than white patients.
"It's important to keep in mind that pulse oximeters give us an estimate, but it's more than just a number. We use that estimate to make clinical decisions, such as how much supplemental oxygen to give a patient," corresponding author Dr. Eric Gottlieb, who completed the research while a fellow in the renal division at Brigham, said in a hospital news release. "It has real meaning for the patients that we care for because we can track back racial disparities in treatment to these differences in measurements."
The problem with pulse oximeters is certainly not new to federal health officials.
In February 2021, the FDA issued a warning that advised against making clinical decisions based on one pulse oximeter reading alone.
"As someone who does a lot of consultation with patients on the floor, I'm terrified by the number of times I've been reassured by a number on a pulse-ox or blood gas and possibly missed the real cause of the problem altogether," Iwashyna said. "We use this as a vital sign."
But, "573,000 times in the seven years of our data there were cases where we recorded a pulse oximeter reading on a Black veteran that missed occult hypoxemia which we wouldn't have missed if the device worked as well on the Black vet as it does on a white vet," Iwashyna said. "That number haunts me."
But Venkatesh warned against drawing any conclusions that involved changing health care practice.
"The only solution here is to figure out if there's an engineering solution on the device," Venkatesh said. "We shouldn't be changing practice on this, we should be changing the device."
Visit Johns Hopkins for more on pulse oximetry.
SOURCES: Theodore J. Iwashyna, MD, PhD, professor, internal medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor; Arjun Venkatesh, MD, associate professor, Yale Medicine, New Haven, Conn.; Brigham and Women's Hospital, news release, July 11, 2022; BMJ, July 6, 2022, online; JAMA Internal Medicine, July 11, 2022, online
- Blood Oxygen Tests Can Be Inaccurate for Black Patients, Raising ... ›
- Pulse Oximeter Readings May Be Inaccurate in Black Patients ... ›
- What Is a Pulse Oximeter, and Should You Get One to Warn of ... ›
This story may be outdated. We suggest some alternatives.
The content contained in this article is over two years old. As such our recommendation is that you reference the articles below for the latest updates on this topic. This article has been left on our site as a matter of historic record. Please contact us at firstname.lastname@example.org with any questions.