HealthDay operates under the strictest editorial standards. Our syndicated news content is completely independent of any financial interests, is based solely on industry-respected sources and the latest scientific research, and is carefully fact-checked by a team of industry experts to ensure accuracy.
- All articles are edited and checked for factual accuracy by our Editorial Team prior to being published.
- Unless otherwise noted, all articles focusing on new research are based on studies published in peer-reviewed journals or issued from independent and respected medical associations, academic groups and governmental organizations.
- Each article includes a link or reference to the original source.
- Any known potential conflicts of interest associated with a study or source are made clear to the reader.
Please see our Editorial and Fact-Checking Policy for more detail.Editorial and Fact-Checking Policy
HealthDay Editorial Commitment
HeathDay is committed to maintaining the highest possible levels of impartial editorial standards in the content that we present on our website. All of our articles are chosen independent of any financial interests. Editors and writers make all efforts to clarify any financial ties behind the studies on which we report.
WEDNESDAY, April 3, 2019 (Pharmacist's Briefing) -- More than 73 percent of U.S. allergists report prescribing sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT), according to research published online April 1 in the Annals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology.
Anita Sivam, D.O., from the University of Tennessee Health Science Center, and Mike Tankersley, M.D., from the Tankersley Clinic, both in Memphis, surveyed allergists to examine current trends in subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) and SLIT utilization. Data were included for 305 respondents; of these respondents, 268 practiced in the United States.
The researchers found that 90.7 and 73.5 percent of allergists practicing in the United States reported using SCIT and SLIT, respectively. Of those who had used SLIT, 11.2, 38.3, and 50.5 percent reported extensive, little, and some experience, respectively. Of those reporting SLIT use in the previous three years, 62.2, 18.1, 9.0, and 10.6 percent had placed one to 10, 11 to 20, 21 to 50, and more than 50 patients on SLIT, respectively. In the United States, 75.4 percent of allergists believe SLIT was safer than SCIT, but 78.0 percent felt that SLIT was less effective than SCIT. The main barrier to SLIT utilization was the limitation of treating only one allergen (73.5 percent).
"As the primary barrier for more widespread use of SLIT tablets is the limitation of treating to only one allergen, strategies for administering multiallergen SLIT tablets [require] more exploration and research," the authors write.
One author disclosed financial ties to ALK.
This story may be outdated. We suggest some alternatives.
The content contained in this article is over two years old. As such our recommendation is that you reference the articles below for the latest updates on this topic. This article has been left on our site as a matter of historic record. Please contact us at firstname.lastname@example.org with any questions.