HealthDay operates under the strictest editorial standards. Our syndicated news content is completely independent of any financial interests, is based solely on industry-respected sources and the latest scientific research, and is carefully fact-checked by a team of industry experts to ensure accuracy.
- All articles are edited and checked for factual accuracy by our Editorial Team prior to being published.
- Unless otherwise noted, all articles focusing on new research are based on studies published in peer-reviewed journals or issued from independent and respected medical associations, academic groups and governmental organizations.
- Each article includes a link or reference to the original source.
- Any known potential conflicts of interest associated with a study or source are made clear to the reader.
Please see our Editorial and Fact-Checking Policy for more detail.Editorial and Fact-Checking Policy
HealthDay Editorial Commitment
HeathDay is committed to maintaining the highest possible levels of impartial editorial standards in the content that we present on our website. All of our articles are chosen independent of any financial interests. Editors and writers make all efforts to clarify any financial ties behind the studies on which we report.
TUESDAY, April 20, 2021 (HealthDay News) -- Meatpacking plants were the source of an estimated 334,000 COVID-19 cases in the United States, according to a new study. It puts the economic toll stemming from those cases at $11.2 billion.
And study author Tina Saitone, a livestock and rangeland economics cooperative extension specialist at the University of California, Davis, said those numbers are conservative.
The research included U.S. counties with large meatpacking plants that produced more than 10 million pounds a month. The investigators looked at infections within 150 days after the first documented COVID case in each county.
Beef- and pork-processing plants more than doubled infection rates in counties where they were located, while chicken-processing plants increased rates by 20%, according to the study.
Explaining why they believe the true numbers are likely higher, the researchers noted they focused on infection rates within counties with meatpacking plants and didn't account for cases that might have been contracted at a meatpacking plant but spread to other counties.
"Similarly, our study likely understates true economic losses," Saitone said in a university news release.
While the study assessed lost wages and deaths, it did not include long-term health care costs, or the costs of worker safety measures.
"While we did see an initial ramp up in cases attributable to meatpacking facilities, over time infection rates were the same per capita as counties without them, partly because meatpacking plants implemented a lot of protocols to protect employees," Saitone said.
The COVID pandemic led to massive disruptions in the food supply chain. Some critics have said a smaller, more geographically dispersed industry would make it less susceptible to a pandemic, the researchers noted.
But such a change would add to costs and increase food prices, they pointed out.
Instead, economists suggest the meatpacking industry could look into automation and technological innovations that made the poultry industry more resilient to the COVID-19 pandemic.
The results were published online recently in the journal Food Policy.
The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has more on meat/poultry plants and COVID-19.
SOURCE: University of California, Davis, news release, April 15, 2021
This story may be outdated. We suggest some alternatives.
The content contained in this article is over two years old. As such our recommendation is that you reference the articles below for the latest updates on this topic. This article has been left on our site as a matter of historic record. Please contact us at email@example.com with any questions.
Updated on May 24, 2022