HealthDay operates under the strictest editorial standards. Our syndicated news content is completely independent of any financial interests, is based solely on industry-respected sources and the latest scientific research, and is carefully fact-checked by a team of industry experts to ensure accuracy.
- All articles are edited and checked for factual accuracy by our Editorial Team prior to being published.
- Unless otherwise noted, all articles focusing on new research are based on studies published in peer-reviewed journals or issued from independent and respected medical associations, academic groups and governmental organizations.
- Each article includes a link or reference to the original source.
- Any known potential conflicts of interest associated with a study or source are made clear to the reader.
Please see our Editorial and Fact-Checking Policy for more detail.Editorial and Fact-Checking Policy
HealthDay Editorial Commitment
HeathDay is committed to maintaining the highest possible levels of impartial editorial standards in the content that we present on our website. All of our articles are chosen independent of any financial interests. Editors and writers make all efforts to clarify any financial ties behind the studies on which we report.
MONDAY, Jan. 29, 2018 (HealthDay News) -- Whether you trust a stranger may depend on how much they look like an old friend, a new study suggests.
In a series of experiments, New York University researchers found that study participants were more likely to pick photos of strangers who resembled honest people they had met in an earlier experiment than photos of strangers who reminded them of dishonest people they'd encountered in an earlier game.
"We make decisions about a stranger's reputation without any direct or explicit information about them based on their similarity to others we've encountered, even when we're unaware of this resemblance," said study senior author Elizabeth Phelps. She's a professor in NYU's department of psychology.
"This shows our brains deploy a learning mechanism in which moral information encoded from past experiences guides future choices," she added in a university news release.
The research, which was led by Oriel FeldmanHall, as a post-doctoral fellow at NYU, was published Jan. 29 in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
"Our study reveals that strangers are distrusted even when they only minimally resemble someone previously associated with immoral behavior," FeldmanHall said.
"Like Pavlov's dog, who, despite being conditioned on a single bell, continues to salivate to bells that have similar tones, we use information about a person's moral character -- in this case whether they can be trusted -- as a basic Pavlovian learning mechanism in order to make judgments about strangers," she explained.
FeldmanHall is now an assistant professor in Brown University's department of cognitive, linguistic, and psychological sciences.
The study was funded by the U.S. National Institute on Aging.
Helpguide.org offers advice on meeting new people and making friends.
This story may be outdated. We suggest some alternatives.
The content contained in this article is over two years old. As such our recommendation is that you reference the articles below for the latest updates on this topic. This article has been left on our site as a matter of historic record. Please contact us at firstname.lastname@example.org with any questions.
Updated on May 28, 2022