HealthDay operates under the strictest editorial standards. Our syndicated news content is completely independent of any financial interests, is based solely on industry-respected sources and the latest scientific research, and is carefully fact-checked by a team of industry experts to ensure accuracy.
- All articles are edited and checked for factual accuracy by our Editorial Team prior to being published.
- Unless otherwise noted, all articles focusing on new research are based on studies published in peer-reviewed journals or issued from independent and respected medical associations, academic groups and governmental organizations.
- Each article includes a link or reference to the original source.
- Any known potential conflicts of interest associated with a study or source are made clear to the reader.
Please see our Editorial and Fact-Checking Policy for more detail.Editorial and Fact-Checking Policy
HealthDay Editorial Commitment
HeathDay is committed to maintaining the highest possible levels of impartial editorial standards in the content that we present on our website. All of our articles are chosen independent of any financial interests. Editors and writers make all efforts to clarify any financial ties behind the studies on which we report.
FRIDAY, Sept. 25, 2015 (HealthDay News) -- Low cut-off levels used in the D-Dimer-Ultrasonography in Combination Italian Study (DULCIS) resulted in half the recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) events that would have occurred using other criteria in young patients at high risk, according to research published online Sept. 12 in the International Journal of Laboratory Hematology.
Gualtiero Palareti, M.D., from the Italian Association of Anticoagulated Patients in Bologna, and colleagues compared the results obtained in the DULCIS with hypothetical results if the following different cut-off criteria were used: traditional cut-off for VTE exclusion, higher levels in subjects aged ≥60 years, or age multiplied by 10.
The researchers found that in young subjects the DULCIS low cut-off levels resulted in half the recurrent events that would have occurred using the other criteria, whereas in elderly patients, the DULCIS results were similar to those calculated for the two age-adjusted criteria. Positive results in the large majority of elderly subjects would have occurred with the adoption of traditional VTE exclusion criteria, without a significant reduction in the rate of recurrent event.
"In conclusion, the present analysis shows that the low cutoff levels adopted in the DULCIS study for young subjects resulted in more young patients who resumed anticoagulation with subsequent increased protection from recurrent events in this population that is at high risk of recurrence," the authors write.
This story may be outdated. We suggest some alternatives.
The content contained in this article is over two years old. As such our recommendation is that you reference the articles below for the latest updates on this topic. This article has been left on our site as a matter of historic record. Please contact us at firstname.lastname@example.org with any questions.
Updated on May 31, 2022