HealthDay operates under the strictest editorial standards. Our syndicated news content is completely independent of any financial interests, is based solely on industry-respected sources and the latest scientific research, and is carefully fact-checked by a team of industry experts to ensure accuracy.
- All articles are edited and checked for factual accuracy by our Editorial Team prior to being published.
- Unless otherwise noted, all articles focusing on new research are based on studies published in peer-reviewed journals or issued from independent and respected medical associations, academic groups and governmental organizations.
- Each article includes a link or reference to the original source.
- Any known potential conflicts of interest associated with a study or source are made clear to the reader.
Please see our Editorial and Fact-Checking Policy for more detail.Editorial and Fact-Checking Policy
HealthDay Editorial Commitment
HeathDay is committed to maintaining the highest possible levels of impartial editorial standards in the content that we present on our website. All of our articles are chosen independent of any financial interests. Editors and writers make all efforts to clarify any financial ties behind the studies on which we report.
THURSDAY, Oct. 6, 2011 (HealthDay News) -- Technology that directly oxygenates the blood reduced the risk of death in patients who were severely sickened by the H1N1 flu virus, a new British study shows.
The researchers cautioned that their study had limitations, and they noted that debate continues about the use of the technology, which is expensive.
At issue is a treatment called extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, which oxygenates the blood. It's used to treat people with severe respiratory conditions that prevent their lungs from getting enough oxygen to the blood on their own.
The researchers looked at patients who developed severe respiratory problems due to the H1N1 virus, also known as swine flu, in the United Kingdom during the winter of 2009-2010.
The study was published online Oct. 5 in the Journal of the American Medical Association and presented at the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine meeting in Berlin.
While some have said fears about the flu epidemic were exaggerated, certain people who got infected became very ill, said Dr. Marc Siegel, an internist and clinical associate professor at New York University Langone Medical Center in New York City.
Sixty-nine patients received the oxygenation treatment, and 22 died.
The researchers compared those who got the treatment to similar patients who didn't. Those who received the treatment were roughly half as likely to die as those who didn't.
The study authors acknowledged in a journal news release that factors other than the treatment might explain why patients who got it did so much better.
"The unanswered question here: Who is it worth it for? Who's it useful for?" said Siegel. He believes the treatment could be appropriate for high-risk patients such as those with compromised immune systems and other health problems.
For more about the H1N1 flu virus, visit the U.S. National Library of Medicine.
This story may be outdated. We suggest some alternatives.
The content contained in this article is over two years old. As such our recommendation is that you reference the articles below for the latest updates on this topic. This article has been left on our site as a matter of historic record. Please contact us at email@example.com with any questions.
Updated on September 22, 2022