Neoadjuvant therapy with an NHA associated with longer time to biochemical recurrence, prolonged metastasis-free survival
HealthDay operates under the strictest editorial standards. Our syndicated news content is completely independent of any financial interests, is based solely on industry-respected sources and the latest scientific research, and is carefully fact-checked by a team of industry experts to ensure accuracy.
- All articles are edited and checked for factual accuracy by our Editorial Team prior to being published.
- Unless otherwise noted, all articles focusing on new research are based on studies published in peer-reviewed journals or issued from independent and respected medical associations, academic groups and governmental organizations.
- Each article includes a link or reference to the original source.
- Any known potential conflicts of interest associated with a study or source are made clear to the reader.
Please see our Editorial and Fact-Checking Policy for more detail.Editorial and Fact-Checking Policy
HealthDay Editorial Commitment
HeathDay is committed to maintaining the highest possible levels of impartial editorial standards in the content that we present on our website. All of our articles are chosen independent of any financial interests. Editors and writers make all efforts to clarify any financial ties behind the studies on which we report.
THURSDAY, Sept. 22, 2022 (HealthDay News) -- Neoadjuvant therapy with a novel hormonal agent prior to radical prostatectomy is associated with better outcomes for men with high-risk prostate cancer versus upfront radical prostatectomy, according to a study published in the Oct. 1 issue of The Journal of Urology.
Praful Ravi, M.D., from the Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute in Boston, and colleagues compared outcomes between neoadjuvant therapy with a novel hormonal agent prior to RP (neo-RP) and upfront radical prostatectomy (RP) in patients with high-risk prostate cancer. The analysis included 112 patients in the neo-RP group and 259 in the RP group followed for four years.
The researchers found that after inverse probability of treatment weighting, time to biochemical recurrence (hazard ratio, 0.25) and metastasis-free survival (hazard ratio, 0.26) were significantly longer in the neo-RP versus the RP group. Additionally, in the neo-RP group, rates of adjuvant (7 versus 24 percent) and salvage therapy (34 versus 46 percent) were lower.
"Neoadjuvant therapy with novel hormonal agents before radical prostatectomy is an innovative approach to treatment of prostate cancer with high-risk characteristics," a coauthor said in a statement. "While we await the results of definitive clinical trials, our findings suggest that this approach can improve key outcomes, compared to starting treatment with radical prostatectomy."
Several authors disclosed financial ties to pharmaceutical companies, including Janssen, which funded the study.
This story may be outdated. We suggest some alternatives.
The content contained in this article is over two years old. As such our recommendation is that you reference the articles below for the latest updates on this topic. This article has been left on our site as a matter of historic record. Please contact us at firstname.lastname@example.org with any questions.
Published on September 22, 2022
Read this Next
Other Trending Articles