cognition/cognitive therapyFamily PracticeNeurologyPsychiatryInternal MedicineGeriatricsGeneral HealthScreeningMental HealthCognitive TherapySenior HealthSeniors
HealthDay operates under the strictest editorial standards. Our syndicated news content is completely independent of any financial interests, is based solely on industry-respected sources and the latest scientific research, and is carefully fact-checked by a team of industry experts to ensure accuracy.
- All articles are edited and checked for factual accuracy by our Editorial Team prior to being published.
- Unless otherwise noted, all articles focusing on new research are based on studies published in peer-reviewed journals or issued from independent and respected medical associations, academic groups and governmental organizations.
- Each article includes a link or reference to the original source.
- Any known potential conflicts of interest associated with a study or source are made clear to the reader.
Please see our Editorial and Fact-Checking Policy for more detail.Editorial and Fact-Checking Policy
HealthDay Editorial Commitment
HeathDay is committed to maintaining the highest possible levels of impartial editorial standards in the content that we present on our website. All of our articles are chosen independent of any financial interests. Editors and writers make all efforts to clarify any financial ties behind the studies on which we report.
TUESDAY, Feb. 25, 2020 (HealthDay News) -- The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) concludes that the evidence is lacking and that the balance of benefits and harms of cognitive impairment screening for older adults cannot be established. These findings form the basis of a final recommendation statement published in the Feb. 25 issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association.
Carrie D. Patnode, Ph.D., from the Kaiser Permanente Evidence-Based Research Center in Portland, Oregon, and colleagues conducted a systematic review, including 287 studies with more than 280,000 older adults, to assess the accuracy of cognitive screening instruments in adults aged ≥65 years. In one randomized clinical trial with 4,005 participants, no significant differences were found in health-related quality of life at 12 months. Overall, 224 randomized clinical trials and three observational studies assessed treatment of mild cognitive impairment or mild-to-moderate dementia; none of the treatment trials were linked with a screening program.
Based on evidence from the review, Douglas K. Owens, M.D., from Stanford University in California, and colleagues concluded that the evidence was lacking for community-dwelling adults aged 65 years or older without signs or symptoms of cognitive impairment. The USPSTF concludes that the current evidence is insufficient for determining the balance of benefits and harms for cognitive impairment screening in this population.
"The Task Force is calling for more research to address this serious issue," Owens said in a statement. "Research is especially needed on whether screening and early detection of cognitive impairment helps patients, caregivers, and doctors make decisions about health care or plan for the future."
One author from the recommendation statement disclosed financial ties to Healthwise.
This story may be outdated. We suggest some alternatives.
The content contained in this article is over two years old. As such our recommendation is that you reference the articles below for the latest updates on this topic. This article has been left on our site as a matter of historic record. Please contact us at firstname.lastname@example.org with any questions.
Updated on May 26, 2022
Read this Next
Other Trending Articles