HealthDay operates under the strictest editorial standards. Our syndicated news content is completely independent of any financial interests, is based solely on industry-respected sources and the latest scientific research, and is carefully fact-checked by a team of industry experts to ensure accuracy.
- All articles are edited and checked for factual accuracy by our Editorial Team prior to being published.
- Unless otherwise noted, all articles focusing on new research are based on studies published in peer-reviewed journals or issued from independent and respected medical associations, academic groups and governmental organizations.
- Each article includes a link or reference to the original source.
- Any known potential conflicts of interest associated with a study or source are made clear to the reader.
Please see our Editorial and Fact-Checking Policy for more detail.Editorial and Fact-Checking Policy
HealthDay Editorial Commitment
HeathDay is committed to maintaining the highest possible levels of impartial editorial standards in the content that we present on our website. All of our articles are chosen independent of any financial interests. Editors and writers make all efforts to clarify any financial ties behind the studies on which we report.
TUESDAY, Sept. 22, 2015 (HealthDay News) -- For patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis, the risk of stroke from progression to carotid occlusion is low, according to research published online Sept. 21 in JAMA Neurology.
Catherine Yang, from McMaster University in Hamilton, Canada, and colleagues examined the risk of stroke resulting from progression to occlusion among patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis. They conducted a retrospective analysis of data obtained from 3,681 patients identified from 1990 through 2012.
The researchers found that 8.6 percent of patients with data on sequential annual carotid ultrasonography examination during the study period were asymptomatic before an index occlusion. Most new occlusions (80.4 percent) occurred before 2002, when medical therapy was less intensive, and there was a decrease in frequency by quartile of years. One patient had a stroke at the time of the occlusion (0.3 percent), and three had ipsilateral stoke during follow-up (0.9 percent); all occurred before 2005. At a mean follow-up of 2.56 years, neither severity of stenosis nor contralateral occlusion predicted the risk of ipsilateral stroke or transient ischemic attack, death from stroke, or death from unknown causes (P = 0.80 and 0.73, respectively). The risk of these events was significantly predicted by age, sex, and carotid burden.
"The risk of progression to carotid occlusion is well below the risk of carotid stenting or endarterectomy and has decreased markedly with more intensive medical therapy," the authors write.
This story may be outdated. We suggest some alternatives.
The content contained in this article is over two years old. As such our recommendation is that you reference the articles below for the latest updates on this topic. This article has been left on our site as a matter of historic record. Please contact us at email@example.com with any questions.
Updated on May 31, 2022