HealthDay operates under the strictest editorial standards. Our syndicated news content is completely independent of any financial interests, is based solely on industry-respected sources and the latest scientific research, and is carefully fact-checked by a team of industry experts to ensure accuracy.
- All articles are edited and checked for factual accuracy by our Editorial Team prior to being published.
- Unless otherwise noted, all articles focusing on new research are based on studies published in peer-reviewed journals or issued from independent and respected medical associations, academic groups and governmental organizations.
- Each article includes a link or reference to the original source.
- Any known potential conflicts of interest associated with a study or source are made clear to the reader.
Please see our Editorial and Fact-Checking Policy for more detail.Editorial and Fact-Checking Policy
HealthDay Editorial Commitment
HeathDay is committed to maintaining the highest possible levels of impartial editorial standards in the content that we present on our website. All of our articles are chosen independent of any financial interests. Editors and writers make all efforts to clarify any financial ties behind the studies on which we report.
FRIDAY, Aug. 10 (HealthDay News) -- High-field magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (1.5 Tesla [T], 3 T) is superior to low-field MRI (1 T) for the delineation of alar ligaments (AL), but the field strength does not influence signal intensity in healthy volunteers, according to a study published in the Aug. 1 issue of Spine.
Nina Lummel, M.D., from the University of Munich, and colleagues analyzed coronal and sagittal 2-mm proton-density weighted MRI sequences from 50 healthy volunteers using different MRI field strengths (1 T, 1.5 T, 3 T).
The researchers found that, in the sagittal and coronal view, delineation of AL was significantly better on 3 T and 1.5 T than on 1 T. In the coronal view, delineation was significantly better on 3 T than on 1.5 T, while there was no significant difference in the sagittal view. There was no significant difference in signal intensity of AL in the sagittal view between the three different field strengths. For delineation and signal intensity of AL, inter-rater and intrarater agreements were fair to moderate.
"1.5 T and 3 T significantly improve the delineation of AL when compared with lower field strength (1 T), but signal intensity of the AL in healthy volunteers is not influenced by the field strength," the authors write. "Accordingly, the pathologic relevance of increased signal intensity of the AL, regardless of field strength, may not be indicative of traumatic AL injury."
This story may be outdated. We suggest some alternatives.
The content contained in this article is over two years old. As such our recommendation is that you reference the articles below for the latest updates on this topic. This article has been left on our site as a matter of historic record. Please contact us at email@example.com with any questions.
Updated on June 04, 2022