HealthDay operates under the strictest editorial standards. Our syndicated news content is completely independent of any financial interests, is based solely on industry-respected sources and the latest scientific research, and is carefully fact-checked by a team of industry experts to ensure accuracy.
- All articles are edited and checked for factual accuracy by our Editorial Team prior to being published.
- Unless otherwise noted, all articles focusing on new research are based on studies published in peer-reviewed journals or issued from independent and respected medical associations, academic groups and governmental organizations.
- Each article includes a link or reference to the original source.
- Any known potential conflicts of interest associated with a study or source are made clear to the reader.
Please see our Editorial and Fact-Checking Policy for more detail.Editorial and Fact-Checking Policy
HealthDay Editorial Commitment
HeathDay is committed to maintaining the highest possible levels of impartial editorial standards in the content that we present on our website. All of our articles are chosen independent of any financial interests. Editors and writers make all efforts to clarify any financial ties behind the studies on which we report.
MONDAY, April 1, 2019 (Pharmacist's Briefing) -- The rates of compression-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CO-CPR) and standard CPR (S-CPR) before arrival of emergency medical services (EMS) have increased and are associated with improved survival over no CPR (NO-CPR), according to a study published online April 1 in Circulation.
Gabriel Riva, M.D., from Karolinska Institutet in Stockholm, and colleagues address changes in the rate and type of CPR performed before the arrival of EMS during three consecutive guideline periods (2000 to 2005, 2006 to 2010, and 2011 to 2017). Patients were categorized according to CPR receipt before arrival of EMS.
The researchers found that from the first to the second to the third period, the proportions of patients receiving CPR before EMS arrival increased from 40.8 to 58.8 to 68.2 percent. S-CPR increased from 35.4 to 44.8 and then decreased to 38.1 percent, while CO-CPR increased from 5.4 to 14.0 to 30.1 percent. The change in 30-day survival was from 3.9 to 6.0 to 7.1 percent in the NO-CPR group, from 9.4 to 12.5 to 16.2 percent in the S-CPR group, and from 8.0 to 11.5 to 14.3 percent in the CO-CPR group. The adjusted odds ratios for 30-day survival were 2.6 and 2.0 for S-CPR and CO-CPR, respectively, compared with NO-CPR, for all time periods combined. S-CPR was superior to CO-CPR (adjusted odds ratio, 1.2).
"Increasing CPR rates by simplifying the CPR algorithm for bystanders can increase overall survival," Riva said in a statement.
This story may be outdated. We suggest some alternatives.
The content contained in this article is over two years old. As such our recommendation is that you reference the articles below for the latest updates on this topic. This article has been left on our site as a matter of historic record. Please contact us at firstname.lastname@example.org with any questions.