HealthDay operates under the strictest editorial standards. Our syndicated news content is completely independent of any financial interests, is based solely on industry-respected sources and the latest scientific research, and is carefully fact-checked by a team of industry experts to ensure accuracy.
- All articles are edited and checked for factual accuracy by our Editorial Team prior to being published.
- Unless otherwise noted, all articles focusing on new research are based on studies published in peer-reviewed journals or issued from independent and respected medical associations, academic groups and governmental organizations.
- Each article includes a link or reference to the original source.
- Any known potential conflicts of interest associated with a study or source are made clear to the reader.
Please see our Editorial and Fact-Checking Policy for more detail.Editorial and Fact-Checking Policy
HealthDay Editorial Commitment
HeathDay is committed to maintaining the highest possible levels of impartial editorial standards in the content that we present on our website. All of our articles are chosen independent of any financial interests. Editors and writers make all efforts to clarify any financial ties behind the studies on which we report.
THURSDAY, Feb. 14, 2019 (HealthDay News) -- The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) hip preservation surgery appropriateness classification system is driven almost entirely by age and radiographic hip osteoarthritis (OA) evaluation, according to a study published online Jan. 24 in Arthritis Care & Research.
Daniel L. Riddle, P.T., Ph.D., and Robert A. Perera, Ph.D., both from Virginia Commonwealth University in Richmond, evaluated the contribution of each of the variables used to predict the appropriateness of hip preservation surgery in the recently published AAOS hip preservation surgery appropriateness classification system.
The researchers found that patient age and radiographic hip OA evaluation were the main indications of appropriateness classification (e.g., odds ratio for age <40 years was >999.99, with age >65 years as the referent group, for "Appropriate/May be Appropriate" versus "Rarely Appropriate" vignettes). There was no meaningful contribution to final classification for hip range of motion, risk for negative outcome, and function-limiting pain.
"Patient age and radiographic osteoarthritis severity variables dominated prediction of hip preservation appropriateness and given the rudimentary nature of these variables for such a complex clinical syndrome, there appears to be substantial limitations associated with the AAOS hip preservation appropriateness system," the authors write.
This story may be outdated. We suggest some alternatives.
The content contained in this article is over two years old. As such our recommendation is that you reference the articles below for the latest updates on this topic. This article has been left on our site as a matter of historic record. Please contact us at email@example.com with any questions.
Updated on May 27, 2022