HealthDay operates under the strictest editorial standards. Our syndicated news content is completely independent of any financial interests, is based solely on industry-respected sources and the latest scientific research, and is carefully fact-checked by a team of industry experts to ensure accuracy.
- All articles are edited and checked for factual accuracy by our Editorial Team prior to being published.
- Unless otherwise noted, all articles focusing on new research are based on studies published in peer-reviewed journals or issued from independent and respected medical associations, academic groups and governmental organizations.
- Each article includes a link or reference to the original source.
- Any known potential conflicts of interest associated with a study or source are made clear to the reader.
Please see our Editorial and Fact-Checking Policy for more detail.Editorial and Fact-Checking Policy
HealthDay Editorial Commitment
HeathDay is committed to maintaining the highest possible levels of impartial editorial standards in the content that we present on our website. All of our articles are chosen independent of any financial interests. Editors and writers make all efforts to clarify any financial ties behind the studies on which we report.
FRIDAY, March 29, 2019 (HealthDay News) -- Increased use of tourniquets, blood transfusions, and more rapid prehospital transport time accounted for 44.2 percent of the total mortality reduction seen over time in Afghanistan and Iraq, according to a study published online March 27 in JAMA Surgery.
Jeffrey T. Howard, Ph.D., from the University of Texas at San Antonio, and colleagues retrospectively analyzed data for all 56,763 U.S. military casualties injured in battle in Afghanistan and Iraq from Oct. 1, 2001, through Dec. 31, 2017. The authors examined the impact of interventions (tourniquet use, blood transfusions, and transport to a surgical facility within 60 minutes).
The researchers found that from early to later stages of the conflicts, the case-fatality rate (CFR) decreased in Afghanistan (from 20.0 to 8.6 percent) and in Iraq (from 20.4 to 10.1 percent). For critically injured casualties, survival increased in Afghanistan (from 2.2 to 39.9 percent) and in Iraq (from 8.9 to 32.9 percent). In simulations using data from 23,699 individual casualties, without the interventions assessed, CFR would likely have been higher in Afghanistan and Iraq (estimated, 15.6 and 16.3 percent, respectively), equivalent to 3,672 additional deaths. Of these deaths, 44.2 percent were associated with the interventions studied: 12.9, 23.8, and 7.5 percent with use of tourniquets, blood transfusion, and prehospital transport times, respectively.
"The knowledge gained about the contributions of this critical combination of lifesaving interventions should be implemented in civilian and military trauma care," write the authors of an accompanying editorial.
This story may be outdated. We suggest some alternatives.
The content contained in this article is over two years old. As such our recommendation is that you reference the articles below for the latest updates on this topic. This article has been left on our site as a matter of historic record. Please contact us at email@example.com with any questions.
Updated on May 27, 2022